Skip to content

Lecture 2

chris wiggins edited this page Feb 5, 2018 · 10 revisions

Jan 22, 2018

reading

discussion

  • Wallach

    • "uncomfortable": why?
    • types of analyses:
      • when might we describe vs predict vs explain?
      • who might be more interested in one than the other? (e.g., scientists, social scientists, engineers, social media or advertising companies....)
      • how might these be used?
    • "technology": a technology has several implications, e.g.,
      • design choices
      • additional capabilities
      • original intentended purpose of this capability
      • diversity of unanticipated uses of this technology
  • boyd & crawford

    • why do we strive for "objectivity"? (the answer should not contain the word "truth")
    • think though the sources of subjectivity in the chronology of you relationship with a dataset, e.g.,
      • how the data were generated
      • your mental model of this
      • choices of what to keep and discard (examples, features)
      • choice of model
      • assessment of model
      • development of model into a technology
      • anticipated uses of this technology
      • unanticipated uses of this technology
    • think of a case where data are not "random" or "representative?"

census, statistics, and "computational politics"

readings:

Desrosieres, Alain. "Prefects and Geometers" in The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998, ch 1. (book available through Slack)

Sarah Igo, The Averaged American (Harvard, 2007), introduction.

Zeynep Tufekci, 2014. Engineering the public: Big data, surveillance and computational politics, First Monday, Volume 19, Number 7 - 7 July 2014 http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4901/4097

discussion:

  • vulcans, martians, and domain expertise
  • election of 2016: marketing and polling
  • A/B testing and causality

Clone this wiki locally