Commit 07de945
committed
posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers() and posix_cpu_timer_del()
jira VULN-136691
cve CVE-2025-38352
commit-author Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
commit f90fff1
upstream-diff Used 5.4 LT 78a4b8e3795b31dae58762bc091bb0f4f74a2200 version
If an exiting non-autoreaping task has already passed exit_notify() and
calls handle_posix_cpu_timers() from IRQ, it can be reaped by its parent
or debugger right after unlock_task_sighand().
If a concurrent posix_cpu_timer_del() runs at that moment, it won't be
able to detect timer->it.cpu.firing != 0: cpu_timer_task_rcu() and/or
lock_task_sighand() will fail.
Add the tsk->exit_state check into run_posix_cpu_timers() to fix this.
This fix is not needed if CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK=y, because
exit_task_work() is called before exit_notify(). But the check still
makes sense, task_work_add(&tsk->posix_cputimers_work.work) will fail
anyway in this case.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Benoît Sevens <bsevens@google.com>
Fixes: 0bdd2ed ("sched: run_posix_cpu_timers: Don't check ->exit_state, use lock_task_sighand()")
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit f90fff1)
Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>1 parent a44516d commit 07de945
1 file changed
+9
-0
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1122 | 1122 | | |
1123 | 1123 | | |
1124 | 1124 | | |
| 1125 | + | |
| 1126 | + | |
| 1127 | + | |
| 1128 | + | |
| 1129 | + | |
| 1130 | + | |
| 1131 | + | |
| 1132 | + | |
| 1133 | + | |
1125 | 1134 | | |
1126 | 1135 | | |
1127 | 1136 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments