Skip to content

Conversation

@pjaap
Copy link
Member

@pjaap pjaap commented Oct 14, 2025

No description provided.

@pjaap pjaap force-pushed the feature/multi-coupling branch from ad1f1a1 to 3350966 Compare October 14, 2025 15:19
@pjaap
Copy link
Member Author

pjaap commented Oct 24, 2025

@chmerdon question here: Should we do the QR-truncation only for more than one given matrix?

QR itself is pretty fast and is therefore no performance bottleneck.

@chmerdon
Copy link
Member

maybe we can make a kwarg that is false for one matrix and true for more than one matrix, but that the user can override in case he wants his matrix to be reduced.

@pjaap pjaap force-pushed the feature/multi-coupling branch from 3350966 to 83bc1af Compare October 24, 2025 11:20
@pjaap
Copy link
Member Author

pjaap commented Oct 24, 2025

Rebased and added the flag

@pjaap pjaap requested a review from chmerdon November 10, 2025 13:00
@pjaap
Copy link
Member Author

pjaap commented Nov 10, 2025

Ready from my side

Copy link
Member

@chmerdon chmerdon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@pjaap pjaap merged commit c26fa79 into master Nov 10, 2025
8 checks passed
@pjaap pjaap deleted the feature/multi-coupling branch November 10, 2025 13:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants