Review studyv2 YAML format, if it is really correct

[koppor]

Review PR #13844 for functionality.

Does V2 really work?

---

Reason to have it put to a milestone: When we release the alpha, all users will have updated their study.yml thing. If something does not work, we might be need study version 3; which I don't want to include.

Reason: In main branch there should be a "working" thing and not something broken.

---

I volunteered to check for myself, but maybe others interested in SLR (@InAnYan) could try out.

---

checklist

• version file semvered
• study.yml following the new format added to test cases
• SLR: Add reasoning on databases/catalogs #12631 handled?
• Introduce catalog-specific queries #12639 handled?

[2006e-dot]

/assign-me

[github-actions]

⚠️ Issue Already Assigned

Hi @2006e-dot, this issue is currently assigned to @koppor.

Note

If no progress is made within 21 days, the issue will be automatically unassigned.

Options for contributors

• Wait for availability: The issue may become available if auto-unassigned
• Collaborate: You can ask the assignee if they want help
• Maintainer assistance: A maintainer can add you as co-assignee if appropriate

[koppor]

/assign @2006e-dot

[github-actions]

👋 Hey @2006e-dot, thank you for your interest in this issue! 🎉

We're excited to have you on board. Start by exploring our Contributing guidelines, and set up your local development workspace by following the steps in our workspace setup guidelines to get started smoothly.

For questions on JabRef functionality, you can consult the JabRef Guru. For questions related to the codebase, please start using DeepWiki.

In case you encounter failing tests during development, please check our developer FAQs!

Still facing issues or having more questions? Feel free to ask here on GitHub or on JabRef's Gitter chat. Please don't hesitate to open a (draft) pull request early on to show the direction you are heading towards if unsure.

Happy coding! 🚀

[koppor]

Update: We reverted the PR at #14204.

Thus, work has to resume on #13844.