Skip to content

Conversation

@ReeceGoding
Copy link
Contributor

Added reports of resumable index operations to the mode 0 and mode 4 outputs, as well as the mode where you name one table. The priority set here is very high, but that seems correct. They can prevent DDL!

Brent warned that I should check if the sys.index_resumable_operations honours NOLOCK, but as far as I can tell it's impossible to put a resumable operation in a transaction.

My production experience of resumable operations is very limited, so the warnings that I have given about them relied on either trusting the documentation or doing what I could easily verify. If there are much nastier things to warn of, then somebody should change my strings.

I think that this is my first contribution to sp_BlitzIndex. It is certainly my first non-trivial one. All of my testing says that I've done the work correctly. However, you shouldn't trust a first timer.

Not included: Any reference to the 2022 feature that auto-kills paused indexes. It is in the ALTER DATABASE SCOPED CONFIGURATION docs. I will make an issue for it.

…e mode 0 and mode 4 outputs, as well as the mode where you name one table.

The priority set here is very high, but that seems correct. They can prevent DDL!

Not included: Any reference to the 2022 feature that auto-kills paused indexes. It is in the ALTER DATABASE SCOPED CONFIGURATION docs.
I will make an issue for it.
@BrentOzar
Copy link
Member

Looks good! Tested in my lab, works. Thanks for the pull request, merging into the dev branch, will be in the next release with credit to you in the release notes.

@BrentOzar BrentOzar merged commit adad5ff into BrentOzarULTD:dev Apr 6, 2025
0 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants